Notice that in Figure 3.2, both distributions have identical first moments or central tendencies but clearly the distributions are very different. This difference in the distributional width is measurable. Mathematically and statistically, the width or risk of a variable can be measured through several different statistics, including the range, standard deviation (σ), variance, coefficient of variation, percentile, interquartile range, confidence interval, volatility, beta, Value at Risk, and others.
Variance and standard deviation are two common measures of the second moment. Variance is the average of the squared deviations about their means, in squared units:
Standard deviation is in original units and, thus, useful as a direct means of comparison of dispersion and variability measured in the same units:
Although standard deviation and variances have many uses, those uses are limited because their measurements are in the same units and, hence, are considered absolute values of risk, uncertainty, or spread. Greek letters (μ, σ) and uppercase letters (N) represent the population whereas standard Latin alphabets and lowercase letters (s, n, x) represent the sample.
The coefficient of variation (CV) is unitless and measures relative variability. It thus allows the comparison of two datasets to see which has more variability without worrying about the units.
CV = s/ x̅ or CV = σ/μ
Statistic | # in family |
Food expenditure ($) |
x̅ | 3.23 | $110.5 |
s | 1.34 | $25.25 |
Which has more variation, the number of family members or the food expenditure?
CV in family = 1.34/3.23 = 0.415
CV in expenditures = 25.25/110.25 = 0.229
The calculations show that there is more variation in the number of family members.